Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Castillo v. Cruz
as 2:2014cv01296
Plaintiff:
Antonio Castillo
Defendant:
Cynthia Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castillo v. Ingram et al
as 2:2014cv00332
Plaintiff:
Troy Castillo
Defendant:
Kevin Ingram, James Nadeau, Richard Putnam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Castillo v. Legrand et al
as 3:2013cv00704
Petitioner:
Gerardo Castillo
Respondent:
Legrand and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castillo v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv00360
Respondent:
Renee Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Rafael Castillo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez-Castillo v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2013cv01158
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Rodriguez-Castillo
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NOT USED
as 2:2013cv01142
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Rodriguez-Castillo
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rutledge et al v. Figuiredo et al
as 2:2013cv00783
Defendant:
Board of Directors of Double Crown Resources, Inc., Antonio B Castillo, Diane Dalmy and others
Nominal Defendant:
Double Crown Resources, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Falco Investments and Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01806
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Castillo v. Napolitano et al
as 2:2012cv01387
Petitioner:
Gustavo Zamora Del Castillo
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder and Janet Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
