Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02633
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nolte Associates, Inc. et al v. Hotel Gold Crown Champa, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00508
Plaintiff:
Nolte Associates, Inc. and Oz Architecture of Boulder, Inc.
Defendant:
Hotel Gold Crown Champa, LLC , H & M Mortgage & Investments, LLC , Keybank National Association and others
Receiver:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Olsen-Hagen v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 1:2010cv02761
Plaintiff:
Heidi K. Olsen-Hagen
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Olsen
as 1:2010cv02078
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Vincent Olsen
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11101
BBVA Compass Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Olson et al
as 1:2010cv00528
Plaintiff:
BBVA Compass Insurance Agency, Inc.
Defendant:
Darrell C.R. Olson, II , Lance Olsen , Olson & Olson Insurance Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Strich v. Salazar et al
as 1:2009cv01913
Plaintiff:
Ronald Strich
Defendant:
Kenneth (I) Salazar, Kenneth Salazar, Thomas (I) Tidwell and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1737 FLPMA
McDowell v. Arapahoe Cty D.H.S. et al
as 1:2008cv02543
Plaintiff:
Jeanette McDowell
Defendant:
Arapahoe Cty D.H.S., Dave Giant, Lisa Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.