Cases 31 - 40 of 264
Homer v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Homer
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Front Row Technologies, LLC v. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd.
as 4:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
Front Row Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Stevens v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Zachius M Stevens
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meares v. Rowe, et al
as 5:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Meares
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Lubbock County Detention Center and Charles Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meares v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00197
Petitioner:
Michael Aaron Meares
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Young v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Charles Young
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, FNU LNU 5:23-CV-190-H-1 and FNU LNU 5:23-CV-190-H-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirk v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Troy Kirk
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, NFN Hinley, NFN Ponce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olveda v. K & S Freight Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Daisy Olveda
Defendant:
K & S Freight Enterprises, Inc. and Phillip Rowe Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Stevens v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Zachius M Stevens
Defendant:
Sheriff Kelly S Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pulley v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00173
Petitioner:
Aaron Jershon Pulley
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
