Cases 31 - 40 of 3,398
Huberman v. A&D Performance, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv01484
Plaintiff:
Andrew Huberman
Defendant:
A&D Performance, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Necessary v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00401
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Andrew Necessary
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Andrew S. Jackson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Andrews v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Ayande Andrews
Defendant:
State of Illinois and Illinois Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stegmeyer et al v. ABM Industries Incorporated et al
as 1:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stegmeyer and Amanda Brinton
Defendant:
ABM Industries Incorporated, FlashParking, Inc. and ParkPliant, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Nelson v. Creative Capital Funding, LLC
as 3:2024cv50019
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Nelson
Defendant:
Creative Capital Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cabrera et al v. Ledger SAS et al
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Edwin Cabrera, Kevin Camorlinga, Austin Richard and others
Defendant:
Ledger SAS and Ledger Technologies, Inc.
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC v. Koleno
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
Defendant:
Andrew C. Koleno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braboy v. Tilden et al
as 1:2023cv01464
Plaintiff:
Damien Braboy
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden and Cheryl Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
