Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Annamalai v. US Department of the Treasury et al
as 3:2022cv02038
Defendant:
Annamalai Annamalai, Department of the Treasury, Comptroller General of the United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Annamalai Annamalai v. USA
as 22-12645
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Annamalai v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Daniel Sproul, Nathan Simpkins, Gary Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Annamalai v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv02137
Petitioner:
Annamalai Annamalai
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Annamalai v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01759
Petitioner:
Annamalai Annamalai
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Annamalai v. Sproul
as 3:2022cv00257
Petitioner:
Annamalai Annamalai
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
In re: Annamalai Annamalai
as 22-10092
Petitioner:
In re: ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Annamalai Annamalai
as 21-13002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI, a.k.a. Dr. Commander Selvam, a.k.a. Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
SIVANADIYAN v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv01950
Petitioner:
PARVATHI SIVANADIYAN
Interested Party:
VISHAL KALYANI
Respondent:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Annamalai Annamalai v. Warden
as 21-10161
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
