Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Hakim Ali-Akbar v. Michael McDonald, et al
as 14-15994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAKIM ALI-AKBAR, AKA Fredrick Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCDONALD, BIVINS, D. DAVEY and others
Hakim Ali-Akbar v. Greg Bracket
as 13-16334
Petitioner - Appellant:
HAKIM ALI-AKBAR, AKA Frederick Jones, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee:
GREG BRACKET
Ali Aftasi v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-3170
Petitioner:
ALI AKBAR AFTASI
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Ali-Akbar v. McDonald et al
as 2:2013cv00285
Plaintiff:
Hakim Ali-Akbar
Defendant:
Michael McDonald, Bivins, D Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali-Akbar v. Greg Bracket
as 2:2012cv02414
Petitioner:
Hakim Ali-Akbar
Respondent:
Greg Bracket
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frederick Jones, Sr. v. Matthew Cate
as 12-16933
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK JONES, Sr., AKA Hakim Ali-Akbar
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE
Rubin et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2012mc00153
Plaintiff:
Jenny Rubin, Deborah Rubin, Daniel Miller and others
Defendant:
The Islamic Republic of Iran, The Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini Khamenei and others
Weinstein et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2012mc00150
Plaintiff:
Susan Weinstein and Jeffrey A. Miller
Defendant:
The Islamic Republic of Iran, The Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini Khamenei and others
Stern et al v. The Iranian Ministry of Information and Security et al
as 1:2012mc00151
Plaintiff:
Shaul Stern
Defendant:
The Islamic Republic of Iran, The Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini Khamenei and others
SHOHAM v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2012cv00508
Plaintiff:
BATSHEVA SHOHAM
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
