Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03762
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03678
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SALHAB v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv03679
Plaintiff:
FAWWAZ A. SALHAB
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EDUARDO AGUIRRE and ANDREA J. QUARANTILLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
BOLUSANI v. GONZALES et al
as 2:2007cv03453
Plaintiff:
VIDYASAGAR BOLUSANI
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, MICHEAL CHERTOFF and ANDREA J. QUARANTILLO
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
JIANG v. GONZALES et al
as 2:2007cv02943
Plaintiff:
LONGLONG JIANG
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SIDDIQUI v. GONZALES et al
as 2:2007cv01724
Petitioner:
MUHAMMAD KAMRAN SIDDIQUI
Respondent:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
