Cases 31 - 40 of 2,248
Martin v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Nethanjah Breitenbach
Petitioner:
William Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cabrera v. The State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv01064
Respondent:
Nevada Department of Corrections, The Attorney General of the State of Nevada and The State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Ivonne Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2024cv01069
Defendant:
Julie Williams, Weber, Day and others
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Azcarate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3443
Petitioner:
RAY ANTONIO AZCARATE
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Leibel v. Reubart, et al.
as 24-3395
Petitioner:
TATIANA LEIBEL
Respondent:
REUBART, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Russum v. Warden Bean et al.
as 2:2024cv01017
Petitioner:
Montrell Russum
Respondent:
Warden Bean and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barren v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2024cv00976
Petitioner:
Donald Robin Barren
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Nevada and James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Farnum v. LeGrand, et al.
as 24-3316
Petitioner:
JOHN MICHAEL FARNUM
Respondent:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Gonzales v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-3288
Petitioner:
RAUL GONZALES
Respondent:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Azcarate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3174
Petitioner:
RAY ANTONIO AZCARATE
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
