Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Sap Kray v. Belinda Stewart, et al
as 08-35711
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAP KRAY
Respondent - Appellee:
BELINDA STEWART, Superintendent of Stafford Creek Correctional Center and ROB MCKENNA, Attorney General of the State of Washington
Harry Greer, III v. Belinda Stewart
as 08-35488
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARRY JAMES GREER, III
Respondent - Appellee:
BELINDA STEWART
Aristotle Marr v. Belinda Stewart
as 08-35464
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARISTOTLE NAPOLEON MARR
Respondent - Appellee:
BELINDA STEWART, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Lavine v. Clarke et al
as 3:2008cv05195
Plaintiff:
Bruce David Lavine
Defendant:
Harold W Clarke, Belinda Stewart, Richard Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. State of Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv05420
Plaintiff:
Charles Manning
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Corrections, Stafford Creek Correction Center, Khurshid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobsen v. Stewart
as 2:2007cv01147
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lynn Jacobsen
Respondent:
Belinda Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Stewart
as 3:2007cv05369
Petitioner:
Paul V Rogers
Respondent:
Belinda Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marr v. Stewart
as 2:2007cv00474
Petitioner:
Aristotle Napoleon Marr
Respondent:
Belinda Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Greer v. Stewart
as 2:2007cv00464
Petitioner:
Harry James Greer
Respondent:
Belinda Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Stewart et al
as 2:2007cv00166
Petitioner:
Robert Smith, Jr
Respondent:
Belinda Stewart and Indeterminate Sentence Review Board
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
