Cases 31 - 40 of 133
Fennell v. Bergami et al
as 3:2023cv50003
Petitioner:
Terrell Fennell
Respondent:
Thomas Bergami and D. Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Larrabee v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50446
Petitioner:
Jonathan Wayne Larrabee
Respondent:
T. Bergami and T. Bergami, Warden, USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thompson v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50016
Petitioner:
Elroda Shavaya Thompson
Respondent:
Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Michael Gorbey v. Officer Dole, et al
as 22-3172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DOLE, USP Thomson, JOHN DOE, Sergeant, Dayshift Lieutenant, USP Thomson, CAPTAIN AVERY, USP Thomson and others
Michael Gorbey v. Mr. Barmes, et al
as 22-3173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNSELOR BARMES, USP Thomson, THOMAS BERGAMI, Warden, USP Thomson, ASSOCIATE WARDEN KING, USP Thomson and others
Gorbey v. Dukett et al
as 3:2022cv50423
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Lt. Dukett, Kerry, Fulton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gorbey v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv50403
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Mr. Johnson, Bergami, A. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Bergami
as 1:2022cv01412
Petitioner:
Patrice Lumumba Jones
Respondent:
Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50436
Petitioner:
Patrice Lumumba Jones
Respondent:
Mr. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Michael S. Gorbey v. Officer Dole, et al
as 22-2888
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DOLE, USP Thomson, JOHN DOE, Sergeant, Dayshift Lt, USP Thomson, CAPTAIN AVERY, USP Thomson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
