Cases 31 - 40 of 1,549
Brown v. Dr. Kates Growing Smiles Children's Dentistry, LLC et al.
as 1:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Valissa Brown
Defendant:
Dr. Kates Growing Smiles Children's Dentistry, LLC, Ohio VIP Dental Assisting School and Dale A. Kates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Brown et al v. Yost
as 2:2024cv01401
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Brown, Carlos Buford and Jenny Sue Rowe
Defendant:
David Yost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02370
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Brown
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
N8 Medical, Inc. et al v. Brown
as 2:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
N8 Medical, Inc., N8 Medical, LLC and Kinnear Pharmaceuticals LLC
Defendant:
William E Brown
Brown v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65406
Plaintiff:
Takese S. Brown
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02087
Plaintiff:
Charla Brown
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Brown v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Brown
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Brown v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
Gloria Brown and Tracy Brown
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
