Cases 31 - 40 of 356
James v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Southeast Regional Office et al
as 1:2020cv03327
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
Jesup Federal Correctional Constitution (FCI) and Federal Bureau of Prisons Southeast Regional Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv03293
Defendant:
USP Atlanta, Dr Chakos, Dr Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wyatt Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Laratte v. Johns et al
as 5:2020cv00092
Respondent:
Tracy Johns and The Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Stanley Laratte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oluwamuyuwa v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2020cv00087
Respondent:
The Federal Bureau of Prisons and Tracy Johns
Petitioner:
Oluwamuyiwa Olawoye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jeanty et al v. Elkins et al
as 2:2020cv00076
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ewing, Jason Jerome Springer, Jerome L. Pitts and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Linda Geter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearney v. Unnamed Respondent(s)
as 1:2020cv02804
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent(s)
Petitioner:
John Junior Kearney
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oluwamuyuwa v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2020cv02731
Respondent:
The Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Oluwamuyiwa Olawoye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVE v. STONE
as 3:2020cv00041
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Shailesh Dave
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Quinones-Cedeno v. Keller
as 1:2020cv02577
Defendant:
J.A. Keller and Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Springer v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv02076
Defendant:
FBOP, Warden, United States Penitentiary, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Springer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
