Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 181
JOHNSTON v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00043
Defendant: DOES 1-100 INCLUSIVE, C R BARD INC and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Plaintiff: CYNTHIA JOHNSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSTON v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06256
Defendant: DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Plaintiff: CYNTHIA JOHNSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schubert v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05359
Defendant: C R BARD INC, ETHICON INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff: Kimberly Schubert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAFER-ISAAC v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05172
Plaintiff: TINA L. SHAFER-ISAAC
Defendant: C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05169
Defendant: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and C. R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff: PAUL L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAFER-ISAAC v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05173
Plaintiff: TINA L. SHAFER-ISAAC
Defendant: C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCFARLAND v. C R BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01516
Defendant: C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff: JEANETTE MCFARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv01709
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff: Rachel Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hufnagle v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01710
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff: Clinton Hufnagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pridemore v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04627
Plaintiff: William B. Pridemore
Defendant: C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?