Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 120
In re: Dennis Farmer
as 17-1833
Movant: In re: DENNIS FARMER
Respondent: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
In re: Deray Smith
as 17-1819
Movant: In re: DERAY SMITH
Respondent: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Deondra Williams v. Catherine Bauman
as 17-1532
Petitioner - Appellant: DEONDRA WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant: RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee: DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant: RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee: DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Deray Smith v. Catherine Bauman
as 17-1263
Petitioner - Appellant: DERAY SMITH
Respondent - Appellee: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
In re: Alvino Sinquefield
as 17-1156
Movant: In re: ALVINO RAY SINQUEFIELD
Respondent: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Jermaine Osby v. Catherine Bauman
as 16-2768
Petitioner - Appellant: JERMAINE ALLEN OSBY
Respondent - Appellee: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Charles Fields v. Dan Lesatz, et al
as 16-2711
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES EDWARD FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee: DAN LESATZ, Deputy Warden, SCOTT SPRADER, Deputy Warden, L. PHILLIPSON, Arus and others
Defendant: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, ROBIN GILBERT and BRADLEY HAYNIE
Vince Mann v. Catherine Bauman
as 16-2643
Petitioner - Appellant: VINCE MANN
Respondent - Appellee: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?