Cases 31 - 40 of 126
Hamilton v. Westchester County et al
as 7:2018cv08361
Defendant:
Francis Delgrosso, Raul Ulloa, Leandro Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Davonte Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forbes v. County of Monroe et al
as 6:2018cv06638
Defendant:
County of Monroe and Correct Care Solutions
Plaintiff:
Robert Forbes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meisel v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv07202
Plaintiff:
Matthew Meisel
Defendant:
Dr. Joon Park, Westchester Medical Center, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Westchester County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv05344
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ortiz
Defendant:
Westchester County Jail, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, New York Correct Care Solutions Medical Services P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 1:2018cv04311
Plaintiff:
Rafael Torres
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution and Kulesza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barragan v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04321
Plaintiff:
Jerson Barragan
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global TEL-Link/AdvancePay Services, Aramark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 1:2018cv04247
Plaintiff:
Rafael Torres
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution and Kulesza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carzoglio v. Abrams et al
as 1:2018cv04198
Plaintiff:
Angelo A. Carzoglio
Defendant:
Thomas Abrams, Karl Vollmer, Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04163
Plaintiff:
Jorge Perez
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global Tel-Link/Advance Pay Services, Aramark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04086
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lewis
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global Tel-Link, Aramark Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
