Cases 31 - 40 of 238
The Regents of the University of California v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 1:2022cv06960
Plaintiff:
The Regents of the University of California, a California constitutional corporation, on behalf of its UCLA Health System and The Regents of the University of California
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas and Health Care Service Corporation a Mutual Legal Reserve Co. doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Dignity Health v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 1:2022cv06969
Plaintiff:
DIGNITY HEALTH, a California not-for-profit healthcare corporation and Dignity Health a California not-for-profit healthcare corporation doing business as Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital doing business as Mercy San Juan Medical Center doing business as Mark Twain Medical Center San Andreas doing business as Saint Franci
Defendant:
HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, a Mutual Legal Reserve Co. d.b.a. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS, Health Care Service Corporation a Mutual Legal Reserve Co doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
John Muir Health v. Health Care Service Corporation, et al.
as 1:2022cv06963
Plaintiff:
John Muir Health, a California not-for-profit healthcare corporation and John Muir Health
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation, a Mutual Legal Reserve Co. d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, Health Care Service Corporation a Mutual Legal Reserve Co. doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas and Does 1 through 25, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Pape v. Yoti (USA) Inc.
as 3:2022cv03105
Plaintiff:
O.C., a minor, by and through her Guardian Allison Pape, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals and Allison Pape
Defendant:
Yoti (USA) INC., a California corporation and Yoti (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Line Construction Benefit Fund v. Abbett Electric Corporation
as 1:2022cv06669
Plaintiff:
Line Construction Benefit Fund, A Health Welfare Fund and Line Construction Benefit Fund
Defendant:
Abbett Electric Corporation, A California corporation and Abbett Electric Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Gakuba v. California Attorney General
as 3:2022cv50435
Petitioner:
Peter Gakuba
Respondent:
California Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gakuba v. California Attorney General
as 3:2023cv50015
Petitioner:
Peter Gakuba
Respondent:
California Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Alston Construction Company, Inc., a California Corporation v. Impact Construction Services Division I, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company
as 1:2022cv05586
Plaintiff:
Alston Construction Company, Inc., a California Corporation and Alston Construction Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Impact Construction Services Division I, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company and Impact Construction Services Division I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Line Construction Benefit Fund v. Leatherneck Construction
as 1:2022cv06757
Plaintiff:
Line Construction Benefit Fund, a Health and Welfare Fund and Line Construction Benefit Fund
Defendant:
Leatherneck Construction, A California corporation and Leatherneck Construction
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Munawar et al v. Ameeruddin et al
as 1:2022cv06453
Plaintiff:
Fahim Munawar and Mohammed Samad
Defendant:
Riaz Ameeruddin, Byrds Hot Chicken Oak Lawn LLC, Byrds Hot Chicken Orland Square LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
