Cases 31 - 40 of 75
ORTIZ-CONTRERAS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01950
Plaintiff:
LUCIO ORTIZ-CONTRERAS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
STEPHENSON et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01917
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARROLL STEPHENSON and LONNIE GENE VERNON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
TAYLOR et al v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv01875
Plaintiff:
RALPH TAYLOR, WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS and ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., SARAH QURESHI and JOHN/ JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMPTON v. COMEY et al
as 1:2014cv01641
Plaintiff:
JEROME HAMPTON
Defendant:
JAMES B. COMEY, ANNE MARY CARTER, TIMOTHY J. ERVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
WILLIAMS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01610
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and LEANN LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAMPTON V. COMEY, ET AL.
as 1:2014cv01607
Plaintiff:
JEROME HAMPTON
Defendant:
JAMES B. COMEY, ANNE MARY CARTER, TIMOTHY J. ERVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MALLETT v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv01496
Plaintiff:
DAWANE A. MALLETT
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., JENNIFER COULTER, PAUL ZOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01466
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROSS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01333
Petitioner:
ANDREW GROSS, III
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRELAND v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv00988
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JEFFERSON BRELAND
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
