Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Rangel v. Smith et al
as 2:2015cv00731
Plaintiff:
Robert Rangel
Defendant:
Raymond Smith, FNU Wilmeth, FNU Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. City of Hobbs
as 2:2015cv00716
Plaintiff:
Yohonia Martin
Defendant:
City of Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. City of Hobbs et al
as 2:2015cv00679
Plaintiff:
Larry Singleton
Defendant:
City of Hobbs, City of Hobbs Police Department, Chad Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Donald Woods et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Lea County et al
as 2:2015cv00635
Plaintiff:
Estate of Donald Woods , Brenice Gardner , Morgan Woods and others
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Lea County, Lea County Detention Center, Paddy Downey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rall, et al v. Hobbs Municipal School District, et al
as 2:2015cv00518
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Rall and Keith Rall
Defendant:
Hobbs Municipal School District, TJ Parks, Shelby Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Portillo v. City of Hobbs et al
as 2:2014cv00410
Plaintiff:
Angela Portillo
Defendant:
City of Hobbs, Johnny Cash, Antonio De La Fuente and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Henson v. Grady et al
as 2:2012cv01202
Plaintiff:
Wanda J Henson
Defendant:
Jeremy Grady and City of Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Triad Western Constructors, Inc. v. City of Hobbs
as 1:2010cv00706
Plaintiff:
Triad Western Constructors, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
