Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Angus v. Cook Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Cindy Angus
Defendant:
Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Incorporated, Cook Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook v. Rocky Mountain Sleep Disorders
as 4:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
Shawnalee Rojas Cook
Defendant:
Rocky Mountain Sleep Disorders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Pittsley et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 9:2012cv00196
Plaintiff:
Marilyn M. Pittsley and William Pittsley
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elkins v. City of Glendive et al
as 1:2011cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Elkins
Defendant:
City of Glendive, Dawson County, Glendive Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
Henry Allen Cook
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Porter v. Ferriter et al
as 6:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
Aaron A Porter, Sr.
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter, Montana Department of Corrections, Mike Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cook et al
as 1:2009mc00011
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Trevor G. Cook, Patrick J. Kiley, UBS Diversified Growth and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cook et al
as 1:2009mc00012
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Trevor Cook, Patrick Kiley, Oxford Global Partners and others
Foster v. Mahoney et al
as 6:2009cv00040
Plaintiff:
Gerald Foster
Defendant:
Mike Mahoney, Myron Beeson, Tom Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tabish v. Ferriter et al
as 6:2008cv00036
Plaintiff:
Gregory P. Tabish
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter, Mike Mahoney, Ross Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
