Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 541
(PC) Motley v. Covello
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff: Edward Motley
Defendant: Patrick Covello, Correctional Supervising Cook, Correctional Food Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calderon v. Covello We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv06560
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Calderon
Respondent: P Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Covello
as 23-4286
Petitioner: RICKEY HAWKINS
Respondent: PATRICK COVELLO
(PC) Kendrick v. Covello et al
as 2:2023cv02978
Plaintiff: John F Kendrick and John F. Kendrick
Defendant: Patrick Covello, K. Rodgers and T. Norgaard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClendon v. Covello
as 23-4193
Petitioner: YACUB AVICENNA MCCLENDON
Respondent: PATRICK COVELLO
Dela Calzada v. Patrick Covello We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv06465
Petitioner: Jovencio Dela Calzada
Respondent: Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Calderon v. Covello We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02847
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Calderon
Respondent: P. Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 23-3811
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, J. BENEVIDAZ, Warden, PATRICK COVELLO, Warden and others
Stokes v. Payson et al
as 1:2023cv01324
Plaintiff: Terrance J.M. Stokes
Defendant: Lt. Payson, Warden Robert May, Sgt. O'pray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCavitt v. Covello
as 23-3476
Petitioner: JOSHUAH BRANDON MCCAVITT
Respondent: PATRICK COVELLO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?