Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Sullivan v. Anderson et al
as 6:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Curtis J. Sullivan
Defendant:
Candace Anderson, Blair Hopkins, Mike Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Presser v. Welch et al
as 4:2011cv00038
Plaintiff:
Marvin Presser
Defendant:
Carmen Welch, Simon Follet, Misty Dawn King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Conoco-Phillips Pipe Line Company v. Easement and Right-of-Way Across T36N R11W MPM et al
as 4:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
Conoco-Phillips Pipe Line Company
Defendant:
Easement and Right-of-Way Across T36N R11W MPM, Easement and Right-of-Way Across T33N R6W MPM, Easement and Right-of-Way Across T37N, R13W, MPM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Sullivan v. Rantz et al
as 6:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Curtis J. Sullivan
Defendant:
Elizabeth Rantz and State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. State of Montana
as 9:2010cv00114
Petitioner:
Curtis J. Sullivan
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunsmore v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Dunsmore
Defendant:
State of Montana, Ted O'Lympus, Katherine Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Schnee et al
as 4:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Curtis J. Sullivan
Defendant:
Theresa Schnee and Dr. Gianelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Rantz et al
as 6:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Curtis J. Sullivan
Defendant:
Elizabeth Rantz, Tristian Kohut, State of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Straight v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
Tom E. Straight
Defendant:
State of Montana, Flathead City, Kitty Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunsmore v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Dunsmore
Defendant:
State of Montana, Corrections Corporation of America, Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
