Cases 31 - 40 of 387
Thomas v. Flannagan et al
as 2:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Regan C Thomas and Regan C. Thomas
Defendant:
Robert A Flannagan, Austin C. Brown, M Durton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAWSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22424
Plaintiff:
IONE MARIA DAWSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Joseph v. Williams
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Kenel Joseph
Defendant:
K. Williams, M. Neal, Derek Snider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Dawson et al
as 2:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Marlo Washington
Defendant:
Dawson, K. Cecilia and G. Brock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARRANTES v. DAWSON et al
as 9:2023cv80851
Counter Defendant:
HECTOR A BARRANTES
Counter Claimant:
FRANCES C. DAWSON
Defendant:
COLLEEN FOXWORTHY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bowden v. Frost et al
as 2:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bowden
Defendant:
Moses Frost, FNU Torres, E. Govea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leaf Capital Funding, LLC v. Dawson
as 6:2023cv00933
Plaintiff:
LEAF CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC
Defendant:
Kim Y. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
DAWSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10007
Plaintiff:
ALTON DAWSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAWSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2023cv07897
Plaintiff:
Tawana Dawson
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dawson, Sr. v. Boehringer Ingelheim et al
as 3:2023cv21522
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dawson, Sr.
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Manufacturing Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
