Cases 31 - 36 of 36
B. Kyle Benton, P.A. v. Delta Dental Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv06739
Defendant:
DeltaCare USA, Delta Dental Insurance CompanyGeorgia, Delta Dental Insurance Company -- Mississippi and others
Plaintiff:
B. Kyle Benton, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Kaufman & Kaufman Smile Design Studio LLC v. Delta Dental Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv06743
Defendant:
DeltaCare USA, Delta Dental Insurance CompanyGeorgia, Delta Dental Insurance Company -- Mississippi and others
Plaintiff:
Kaufman & Kaufman Smile Design Studio LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Delta Dental Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2019cv06734
Defendant:
DeltaCare USA, Delta Dental Insurance CompanyGeorgia, Delta Dental Insurance Company -- Mississippi and others
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Dolgow, D.D.S., P.A., Drs. DelMonico and Trocchio, Ltd., Tooth Town Pediatric Dentistry, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Legacy Dental Associates, P.C. v. Delta Dental Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv06744
Defendant:
DeltaCare USA, Delta Dental Insurance CompanyGeorgia, Delta Dental Insurance Company -- Mississippi and others
Plaintiff:
Legacy Dental Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Jessica Saepoff v. Jay Riehle, et al
as 17-35589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSICA SAEPOFF, in propia persona
Defendant - Appellee:
JAY RIEHLE, Revenue Officer, individually and in his capacity as employee of the United States, Internal Revenue Service, THOMAS A. BYRD, Revenue Officer, individually and in his capacity as employee of the United States, Internal Revenue Department, JOHN A. KOSKINEN, Commissioner, individually and in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and others
Saepoff v. Riehle et al
as 2:2017cv00482
Plaintiff:
Jessica Saepoff
Defendant:
Jay Riehle , Thomas A Byrd , John Koskinen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
