Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Reginald M Williams v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2012cv04256
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Terri Gonzalez, Terri Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald M Williams
Reginald M Williams v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2012cv02722
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Chief Deputy Warden John Doe, Chief Deputy Warden John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald M Williams
Lopez v. Chief Deputy Warden et al
as 1:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lopez
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Warden and Correctional Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Roscelli et al
as 1:2011cv01912
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Harris
Defendant:
J. Roscelli, H. Hughes, Deputy Warden for Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinegal v. Verduzco et al
as 3:2011cv02534
Plaintiff:
Ramon Ladale Sinegal
Defendant:
H. Verduzco, C. Ortega, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Ortiz v. Warden B. Cash et al
as 2:2011cv07405
Defendant:
Belavich, B. Cash, Deputy Warden L. Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Ortiz
Timothy E. Spellman v. B.M. Cash et al
as 2:2011cv05563
Defendant:
B. M. Cash, Warden B. M. Cash, B. Chavarria and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy E Spellman
George Owens v. California Department of Mental Health
as 2:2010cv09399
Respondent:
Chief Deputy Warden G. E. Brochy and District Attorney Steve Cooley
Petitioner:
George E. Owens
Curtis Tony Clark v. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2010cv07698
Petitioner:
Curtis Tony Clark
Respondent:
People of the State of California and The Chief of Deputy Warden of H.D.S.P.
Baldwin v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2009cv00711
Plaintiff:
Greogry V. Baldwin
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Fannon, M. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
