Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Christopher SirmonsIn re: Christopher Sirmons
as 19-2504
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER LEE SIRMONS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
Ernie Mojica v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 19-2042
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNIE MOJICA
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Antoine Williams v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 19-2112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTOINE SHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Marcus Graham v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 17-3660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS LEE GRAHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Wayne Kelly
as 17-1514
Petitioner:
In re: WAYNE CURTIS KELLY
Respondent:
THERESA DELBALSO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Jeffrey Clapsadl
as 17-1135
Petitioner:
In re: JEFFREY DAVID CLAPSADL
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
Albert Troche, Jr. v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 16-4163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT TROCHE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
William Bibbs v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 16-3983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM C. BIBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
In re: Christopher Sirmon
as 16-3828
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER LEE SIRMONS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
Juan Ortiz v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 16-2309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
