Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Imagination Products Corporation v. Doe 1 Aigtgrr
as 1:2021cv00441
Plaintiff:
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1 and Imagination Products Corporation
Defendant:
Does 1-63, Doe 34 Storesroomsui, Doe 49 goodforyou-ra and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Washington v. Kester et al
as 3:2020cv50266
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John or Jane Doe 7, John or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HB Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-19
as 1:2019cv07005
Plaintiff:
HB Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-19, Doe 18, Doe 13 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Clark v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv00440
Petitioner:
Sacorey Lennel Clark, Sacorey Lennel Clark Trust and Secured Party Sacorey-Lennel
Respondent:
USA, United States Department of Justice, John Doe, 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv00297
Petitioner:
Sacorey Lennel Clark, Sacorey Lennel Clark Trust, Sacorey Clark and others
Respondent:
John Doe, 3, United States, John Doe, 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rosetto v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv01131
Plaintiff:
Perry James Rosetto
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Randy Pfister, Salem Obaisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kruger v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv00512
Plaintiff:
Joshua W. Kruger
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jacqueline A. Lashbrook, Kimberly Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
Terry Rogers
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jacqueline A. Lashbrook, C/O Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv05769
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, K. Johnson, Velez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Does 13-18
as 3:2017cv00124
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Cunningham, Sr.
Defendant:
John Does 13-18
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
