Cases 31 - 40 of 240
Bell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv03678
Plaintiff:
Lauri Bell and Terrill Bell
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01172
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Blake Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Contreras et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv03634
Plaintiff:
Lucia Contreras and Conrado Contreras
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baksic et al v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00920
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc.
Plaintiff:
Danielle Baksic and Brian Baksic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Janice Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00366
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Jones and Robert Jones
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon LLC, American Medical Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meindertsma et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00708
Plaintiff:
Bruce Meindertsma and Jeanne Meindertsma
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, American Medical Systems Inc, Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mobley et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00602
Plaintiff:
Tasha Mobley and Douglass Daniels
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pizzitola v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv02256
Plaintiff:
Tammy Pizzitola
Defendant:
Ethicon, LLC, C R Bard Inc, Ethicon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davila v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 6:2020cv00551
Plaintiff:
Rafaela Davila
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and C. R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
