Cases 31 - 39 of 39
SMITH v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00533
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SMITH
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amador v. Town of Davie et al
as 0:2017cv62147
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Amador
Defendant:
Town of Davie , Patrick Lynn, Edward Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Brookfield Asset Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv23788
Plaintiff:
Patricia Smith and Edward Smith
Defendant:
Brookfield Asset Management, Inc., Kerzner International Limited, Kerzner International Bahamas Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Commercial Building Maintenance Janitorial of Jacksonville, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01510
Plaintiff:
Edward Smith and Antoinette Smith
Defendant:
Commercial Building Maintenance Janitorial of Jacksonville, Inc. and Scott Decrispino
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Smith v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
as 8:2013cv03071
Plaintiff:
Edward Smith
Defendant:
NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Smith v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
as 8:2013cv03070
Plaintiff:
Edward Smith
Defendant:
Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Smith v. Artisan Bread Company et al
as 2:2013cv00772
Plaintiff:
Edward Smith
Defendant:
Artisan Bread Company and Todd Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv24100
Plaintiff:
Edward Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2011cv21219
Plaintiff:
Ernest Edward Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
