Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Raul v. Given Imaging Ltd. et al
as 1:2014cv00149
Plaintiff:
David Raul
Defendant:
Given Imaging Ltd., Ari Bronshtein, James M. Cornelius and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01445
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Givens v. Miller's Ale House, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00744
Plaintiff:
Debra J. Givens
Defendant:
Miller's Ale House, Inc. and Alpharetta Investors, LLC
GIVENS v. Publix Super Markets Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY GIVENS
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets Inc and PUBLIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Given v. Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company
as 1:2012cv03313
Plaintiff:
Maxine Given
Defendant:
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company
Movant:
American Arbitration Association
Given v. Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company
as 1:2012mi00159
Plaintiff:
Maxine Given
Defendant:
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company
Movant:
American Arbitration Association
Veal v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00133
Plaintiff:
Ralph Carl Veal , Troy Givens, Clarence Dalcour and others
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation , FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and FedEx Home Delivery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Veal v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv01768
Plaintiff:
Ralph Carl Veal , Troy Givens, Clarence Dalcour and others
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and FedEx Home Delivery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00143
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
