Cases 31 - 40 of 133
Porozynski v. Denison Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03081
Plaintiff:
Erik Porozynski
Defendant:
Denison Auto Parts, Inc., Gary C. Weiss and Rick Ritter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Palladeno v. Mohr et al
as 2:2016cv01126
Plaintiff:
Ted Palladeno
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Roger Wilson, Robert Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Toledo Correctional Facility Mental Health Department et al
as 3:2016cv02354
Plaintiff:
Marcos Langoria Thomas, Sr.
Defendant:
Toledo Correctional Facility Mental Health Department, Anderson, McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Toledo Correctional Facility Mental Health Department et al
as 1:2016cv00933
Plaintiff:
Marcos Langoria Thomas, Sr.
Defendant:
Toledo Correctional Facility Mental Health Department, Anderson, McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Department of Labor v. ARS Ohio, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00862
Plaintiff:
U.S. Department of Labor
Defendant:
ARS Ohio, LLC, Gary C. Finn and Karen M. Finn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Department of Labor v. ARS Ohio, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00963
Plaintiff:
U.S. Department of Labor
Defendant:
ARS Ohio, LLC, Gary C. Finn and Karen M. Finn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Yaacov v. Mohr et al
as 1:2016cv02171
Plaintiff:
Abraham Yaacov
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr, Mike Davis, Margaret A. Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Hughes et al
as 2:2016cv00800
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Malone
Defendant:
Justin Hughes, Linner Mahlman, William Cool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Hughes et al
as 1:2016cv00851
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Malone
Defendant:
Justin Hughes, Linner Mahlman, William Cool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Kline et al
as 4:2016cv01926
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Thompson
Defendant:
James Kline, G. Lewis, Stuart Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
