Cases 31 - 40 of 53
GATLIN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01935
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff:
EARNESTINE GATLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GATLIN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01705
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff:
JERIS GATLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins v. Gatlin Brothers of Daytona Beach, LLC et al
as 6:2016cv01975
Plaintiff:
Pamela Collins and Tavia Wagner
Defendant:
Gatlin Brothers of Daytona Beach, LLC and Angela and Brittany, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Caldwell v. Estate of Roman Blum et al
as 1:2015cv24202
Plaintiff:
Emmett W. Caldwell
Defendant:
Estate of Roman Blum, Clerk of Court and Gary Gatlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Davis et al v. Management Health Solutions, Inc.
as 8:2013cv01851
Plaintiff:
Nattanna Davis and Brenda Gatlin
Defendant:
Management Health Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Gatlin v. Osceola County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2013cv00984
Plaintiff:
Isaac Robertson Gatlin
Defendant:
Osceola County Sheriff's Department, Bradley Kraus, Marcos R. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
