Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Abraham v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Abraham
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Carl Danberg, Patrick Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv01035
Plaintiff:
Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Roman Shankaras
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00829
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickens et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Dickens, Roman Shankaras and Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00732
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Thomas L. Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brathwaite v. Phelps et al
as 1:2010cv00646
Plaintiff:
Kevin C. Brathwaite
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, David Pierce, Christopher Klien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainier v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00498
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Rainier, Sr.
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Carl Danberg, Richard Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Beckles et al
as 1:2010cv00362
Plaintiff:
Gregory F. Robinson
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Scaroborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. Phelps et al
as 1:2010cv00307
Plaintiff:
Wardell Leroy Giles
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Costello, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
