Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Graves v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00547
Plaintiff:
Kim Graves
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Graves v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
as 6:2017cv01856
Plaintiff:
Kim Graves
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Stone v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jeanie Stone
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Morgan v. Harley Davidson Financial Services, Inc
as 4:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Keith Morgan
Defendant:
Harley Davidson Financial Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 USC 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Oliver v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
as 6:2017cv00126
Plaintiff:
Michael Oliver
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Stepak v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
as 8:2016cv03214
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stepak and Janet Stepak
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Palau v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
as 6:2016cv01588
Plaintiff:
Oscar Palau
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Tonstad v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00325
Plaintiff:
Richard Tonstad
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
