Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Foster v. Wathen et al
as 7:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Donald Foster
Defendant:
Richard Wathen, Charles Horsley, James D Anders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sawyer v. Director TDCJ-CID, et al
as 7:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sawyer
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID, David Potter, Richard E. Wathen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Cortez et al
as 7:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Archie Jordan
Defendant:
Ismael Cortez, Joseph Michael Eastridge, Charles R Horsley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Parker et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ)
as 7:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nedro Gwen Parker and Frederick Deone Gooden
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, James D Anders, Charles Horsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Christopher Curtis
Defendant:
Charles R Horsley, Krista M Vasquez, Jose A Armenedariz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickinson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02069
Plaintiff:
William E. Dickinson , Larry . Anderson , Verne R. Anderson and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Vogelgesang et al
as 5:2011cv00129
Plaintiff:
Ruben Garcia
Defendant:
Richard D Vogelgesang, Gary L. Griggs, Charles R Horsley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Shinkle et al
as 3:2011cv00320
Plaintiff:
Myran Kelley
Defendant:
Jack Shinkle, Karen Horsley and Ms. Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Shinkle et al
as 1:2011cv00039
Plaintiff:
Myran Kelley
Defendant:
Jack Shinkle, Karen Horsley and Ms. Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horsley v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv02062
Plaintiff:
Nena L Horsley
Defendant:
Michael James Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
