Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Hamilton v. Tristan et al
as 1:2011cv00788
Plaintiff:
George Hamilton
Defendant:
David Tristan, Edward Alameida, Thomas - Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier v. Biter et al
as 1:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Collier
Defendant:
M.D. Biter, M. Jefferies, J. Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Harrington et al
as 1:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
Robert Bishop
Defendant:
Kelly Harrington, M.D. Biter, J. Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Harrington et al
as 2:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
Robert Bishop
Defendant:
Kelly Harrington, M.D. Biter, J. Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villery v. Grannis et al
as 1:2010cv01022
Plaintiff:
Jared M. Villery
Defendant:
N. Grannis, Anthony Hedgpeth, J. Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. The State of California et al
as 1:2010cv00636
Plaintiff:
Percy Stockton
Defendant:
The State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windham v. Dill et al
as 1:2009cv02239
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
Defendant:
Nate Dill, Ortiz, Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Harrington et al
as 1:2009cv01823
Plaintiff:
John W. Williams
Defendant:
K. Harrington, J. Castro and T. Billings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv01648
Petitioner:
Guillermo Garcia
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections, N. Grannis, M. L. Sobbe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Cope et al
as 1:2009cv01617
Plaintiff:
Lance R. Martin
Defendant:
B. Cope, Chesly, J. Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
