Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Acosta v. Orsa et al
as 1:2012cv06723
Plaintiff:
Miguel Acosta
Defendant:
W. Orsa, David Barnes, J.S. Pulia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez et al v. City of Chicago, IL et al
as 1:2011cv05681
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Gonzalez , Marisol Gonzalez , Isaias Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, W. Orsa, David Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Laborers' Pension Fund et al v. J.S. Riemer, Inc.
as 1:2011cv03287
Defendant:
J.S. Riemer, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Laborers' Pension Fund , Laborers' Welfare Fund Of The Health and Welfare Department Of the Construction And General Laborers' District Council Of Chicago And Vicinity and James S Jorgensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00426
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Kuhlman v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00119
Defendant:
Trane USA, Inc, Beazer East, Inc., A.W. Chesterton, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Martha Kuhlman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
B.F.G. et al v. Blackmon et al
as 1:2008cv01565
Plaintiff:
B.F.G., B.F.G., B.F.G. and others
Defendant:
Willie Blackmon, Willie Blackmon, Kimberly Smith-Foote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Woods v. Ford Motor Company et al.
as 1:2007cv03488
Plaintiff:
Michael Woods
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Aristeo Construction, Co., C-Logic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Futch v. AIG, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00402
Plaintiff:
Sandra Futch
Defendant:
AIG, Inc., Asbestos Corporation Limited, A.W. Chesterton, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
