Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 144
Lopez de Paz v. Rosen
as 21-6016
Petitioner: HERNAN ISAIAS LOPEZ DE PAZ
Respondent: JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ayabaca Mejia v. Garland
as 21-6015
Petitioner: ROSA INES PIZARRO TENECELA and SEGUNDO GERMAN AYABACA MEJIA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rahman v. Garland
as 21-6011
Petitioner: MD MAKSUDUR RAHMAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Solomonov v. Rosen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-9502
Respondent: JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting United States Attorney General
Petitioner: MIKHAIL SOLOMONOV
Adhikari v. Garland
as 21-6010
Petitioner: SABITRI ADHIKARI
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Garcia Fernandez v. Garland
as 21-6006
Petitioner: JOSBEL ERNESTO GARCIA FERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Morocho v. Garland
as 21-6007
Petitioner: LUIS ANTONIO MOROCHO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Shamal v. Garland
as 21-6008
Petitioner: AHMAD SAMEEM SHAMAL
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Manzano-Anorve v. Rosen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-9501
Petitioner: NOEL MANZANO-ANORVE
Respondent: JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting United States Attorney General
Merchan-Guzman v. Garland
as 21-6005
Petitioner: LUIS ALBERTO MERCHAN-GUZMAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and JEFFREY A. ROSEN, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?