Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Kakosch v. Kaeser et al
as 3:2014cv00095
Plaintiff:
Hanno Kakosch
Defendant:
Joe Kaeser, Cromme, Sedello and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Idaho County Board of Commissioners et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 3:2013cv00436
Plaintiff:
Idaho County Board of Commissioners , Idaho County , Open Roads 4 Idaho Ltd. and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service and Rick Brazell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Soto et al
as 4:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose Soto, Ramiro Ortega, Maria S. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Rusher v. Blades et al
as 1:2012cv00625
Plaintiff:
David Rusher
Defendant:
Randy Blades, Scott Lossmann, Catherine Whinnery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Findley et al
as 2:2012cv00354
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Findley and RTA Operations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Robnett et al
as 1:2012cv00332
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
Shannon Robnett and J & S Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2012cv00270
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
Jefferson M. Jenkins and JMJ Designs, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Beaudoin et al
as 2:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
Wendy Beaudoin, Dave Beaudoin and Lakeview Inn Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Frei et al
as 4:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard T. Frei and Deborah A. Frei
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
