Cases 31 - 40 of 47
HARRIS v. KANE et al
as 1:2013cv00879
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., THOMAS KANE and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IBN-HAMEED v. MADDREN et al
as 1:2012cv01961
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SEIFUDDIN IBN-HAMEED
Defendant:
MICHAEL MADDREN , KENNEY , PATRICIA A. JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
NEAL v. KANE
as 1:2012cv01212
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. NEAL
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICE v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00883
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RICE
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORER-BEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2012cv00267
Plaintiff:
STEPHAN MOORER-BEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, THOMAS KANE, F.B.O.P. ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARR v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00165
Plaintiff:
LENT C. CARR, II
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
DONKOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01515
Petitioner:
ANDREW KWASI DONKOR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
