Cases 31 - 40 of 170
ANDERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al.
as 5:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
IVAN ANDERSON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, KENNETH TUCKER and BRAYANT RANDALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK LLC
as 4:2013cv00266
Plaintiff:
JAMES H LEWIS
Defendant:
KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK LLC and KENNETH TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter v. McNeil et al
as 1:2013cv21484
Plaintiff:
Reginald Walter
Defendant:
Walter McNeil and Kenneth Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter v. McNeil et al
as 1:2013cv21485
Plaintiff:
Reginald Walter
Defendant:
Walter McNeil and Kenneth Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. TUCKER
as 4:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
IVORY S GLENN
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER, C DOUGLAS, M SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOOBYYAA v. TUCKER et al.
as 5:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
MANDINGO BOOBYYAA
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER, BRYANT RANDALL, RICKY CLOUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Lewis v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 13-11054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH TUCKER, official capacity jointly, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, official capcity jointly, AMADOR NAZARENO and others
Banner v. Tucker
as 0:2013cv60537
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Banner
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. TUCKER et al
as 4:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
VERNON ROBINSON
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER, BECKY LAWSON, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Tucker
as 3:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
Anthony Richard Baker
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
