Cases 31 - 40 of 898
Ludwig v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01497
Plaintiff:
William Ludwig
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Teson v. O'Malley
as 4:2023cv01489
Plaintiff:
Anthony Teson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bourbon v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01477
Plaintiff:
Kent Bourbon
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Rimel v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
James Clayton Rimel
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Deck v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Heather Dian Deck
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
In Re:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Frapolli v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01462
Plaintiff:
Katherine Frapolli
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Houchin v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv06153
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Houchin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Kellum v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Leah Kellum
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lamanske v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Leslie Sue Lamanske
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
