Cases 31 - 40 of 131
Octaform Inc. v. Warland
as 2:2019cv00006
Defendant:
H-Pac Plastics, LLC and Leonard S. Warland
Plaintiff:
Octaform Inc.
Tissue Regeneration Technologies, LLC et al v. Male Performance Medical Partnership, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01914
Defendant:
Richard Neiswonger, Male Performance Medical Partnership, LLC, Las Vegas Male Performance Clinic and others
Plaintiff:
General Patent, LLC and Tissue Regeneration Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Flores v. Ginnie Mae et al
as 2:2018cv01865
Defendant:
Ginnie Mae, US Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01640
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01636
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Leonard v. Northern Nevada Correctional Center Dental Department
as 3:2018cv00404
Defendant:
Northern Nevada Correctional Center Dental Department
Plaintiff:
Gregory N. Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01412
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Leonard v. Filson et al
as 2:2018cv00853
Defendant:
Timothy Filson and Adam Paul Laxalt
Plaintiff:
Gregory N. Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hairston v. Lombardo
as 2:2018cv00498
Petitioner:
Leonard M Hairston
Respondent:
Joe Lombardo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Federal Trade Commission v. Internet Teaching and Training Specialists, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03047
Defendant:
David R. Coffin, Jr., Victoria A. Hansen, Internet Teaching and Training Specialists, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
