Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Camp v. Haas et al
as 3:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Aaron Camp and Aaron Camp
Defendant:
Scott Haas, John Rees, Paige McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Richard Morgan v. Larry Chandler
as 09-5126
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD HENRY MORGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY CHANDLER, Warden
Mose Davis v. Larry Chandler, et al
as 08-6513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOSE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY CHANDLER, Warden, MAZEN KHAYAT, Doctor at LaGrange Reformatory in his Individual and Official Capacity and STEVEN WHITE, Doctor at LaGrange Reformatory in his Individual and Official Capacity
Szabo v. Thompson et al
as 3:2008cv00632
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lewis Szabo
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Larry Chandler and J. David Donahue
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Chandler et al
as 3:2008cv00430
Plaintiff:
Mose Davis
Defendant:
Larry Chandler, Mazen Khayat and Steven White
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas Mitchell v. Larry Chandler, et al
as 08-6345
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellant:
LARRY CHANDLER, Warden, KSR, AARON SMITH, Unit Director, KSR and TERRY BELL, Classification Officer, KSR
Uzell McFarland v. Larry Chandler
as 08-6294
Petitioner - Appellant:
UZELL MCFARLAND
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY CHANDLER
Todd Edmonds v. John Rees, et al
as 08-6102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD EDWARD EDMONDS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN D. REES, RON EVERSON, PAIGE MCGUIRE and others
Froman et al v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00243
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Froman, Dale Schwieman, Eric L. Hermansen and others
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, LaDonna Thompson, Larry Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
St. James v. Rees et al
as 3:2008cv00192
Plaintiff:
David St. James
Defendant:
John D. Rees, Larry Chandler, Lucy Strietenberger and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
