Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Dupree v. People of the State of California
as 2:2013cv00870
Petitioner:
Leighton James Dupree
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ana M Hanson et al v. C P Interiors et al
as 8:2012cv01204
Defendant:
C P Interiors, Does and Charlene Leighton
Plaintiff:
Ana M Hanson and Gary J Meyers
U S Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Michael J Leighton
as 2:2012cv04012
Defendant:
Michael J Leighton
Plaintiff:
U S Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation et al v. CP Interiors Inc et al
as 8:2012cv00377
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees for the Carpenters Southwest Trusts and Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation
Defendant:
CP Interiors Inc, Does, Charlene Madlyn Leighton and others
Cook v. Leighton et al
as 2:2011cv03353
Plaintiff:
David L. Cook
Defendant:
Dorleen Leighton, Mallor, Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ana M Hanson et al v. C P Interiors et al
as 2:2011cv08009
Defendant:
C P Interiors, Does and Charlene Leighton
Plaintiff:
Ana M Hanson and Gary J Meyers
Leighton Hull et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 2:2011cv01095
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hull and Leighton Hull
Clip Ventures LLC v. Joe Leighton & Associates, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv04739
Plaintiff:
Clip Ventures LLC
Defendant:
Joe Leighton & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leighton v. Metropolitian Transit System et al
as 3:2010cv00565
Plaintiff:
Lorraine M. Leighton
Defendant:
Metropolitian Transit System, Paul Jablonski, 15 City Counsel Board Members and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joe Leighton & Associates Inc v. Hardware Components Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00156
Defendant:
Does and Hardware Components Inc
Plaintiff:
Joe Leighton & Associates Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
