Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Hinojosa v. Midland Mortgage Co.
as 2:2014cv00477
Plaintiff:
Amador D. Hinojosa
Defendant:
Midland Mortgage Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Nelson v. MidLand Mortgage
as 3:2014cv00330
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Nelson
Defendant:
MidLand Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harrison v. Midland Mortgage et al
as 3:2014cv02956
Plaintiff:
Carlton Harrison
Defendant:
Midland Mortgage , MERS, HUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ramos v. Midland Mortgage
as 4:2014cv00465
Plaintiff:
Mary J. Ramos
Defendant:
Midland Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ramos v. Midland Mortgage, a Division of MidFirst Bank
as 4:2014cv00453
Defendant:
Midland Mortgage, a Division of MidFirst Bank
Plaintiff:
Mary J Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dunn v. MidLand Mortgage
as 4:2013cv03516
Plaintiff:
George Dunn
Defendant:
MidLand Mortgage
Third_party_defendant:
George Dunn, Jr and Aretha Dunn
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
MidLand Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hunt v. Bankruptcy Court Dallas et al
as 3:2013cv04565
Defendant:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court , MidFirst Bank and Midland Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Orothene Z Hunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ezequiel Martinez Power of Attorney for Albert Jaramillo v. MidFirst Bank d/b/a Midland Mortgage
as 5:2013cv00613
Plaintiff:
Ezequiel Martinez Power of Attorney for Albert Jaramillo
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank d/b/a Midland Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Zablosky et al v. MIDFIRST BANK et al
as 5:2013cv00467
Defendant:
MIDFIRST BANK, MIDLAND MORTGAGE CO. and The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Plaintiff:
James E. Zablosky and Karen Zablosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Galvan v. Mitrisin, et al.
as 3:2013cv00165
Plaintiff:
Rosalinda Galvan
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank, Midland Mortgage and Beverly Mitrisin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
