Cases 31 - 40 of 128
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03110
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02476
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lopez, Marshall Rouser, Rick Alfred and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC, NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Coulter et al v. Deere & Company et al
as 4:2021cv02105
Plaintiff:
Marquis Edwin Coulter, Trish Yvonne Snyder, M.C. and others
Defendant:
Cardinal Heavy Equipment Holdings, LLC, Tellus Equipment Solutions, LLC, Deere & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02765
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01678
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. C.R. England
as 3:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Chris Brandon Garcia
Defendant:
C.R. England and Marquis Dequan Monday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00651
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv04082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00400
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
