Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Dawson v. Downey et al
as 2:2014cv02020
Plaintiff:
Fyance Dawson
Defendant:
Michael D Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew, S Handson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge Jr v. Bukowski et al
as 2:2013cv02125
Plaintiff:
Roderic T Hodge Jr
Defendant:
Timothy F Bukowski, Michael D Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leyva v. Bukowski et al
as 2:2013cv02123
Plaintiff:
Giovanni Leyva
Defendant:
Timothy F Bukowski, Michael D Downey, Schlendorf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. US Marshals et al
as 2:2013cv02016
Plaintiff:
Norvell T Moore
Defendant:
Timothy F Bukowski, Kankakee County Jail, Michael D Downey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moore v. U.S. Marshalls et al
as 1:2012cv10025
Plaintiff:
Norvell T Moore
Defendant:
Timothy F Bukowski, Michael D. Downey and Kankakee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thomas Riley v. Chad Kolitwenzew, et al
as 11-3666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS J. RILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAD KOLITWENZEW, MICHAEL D. DOWNEY, TIMOTHY BUKOWSKI and others
Donald Sampson v. Michael Downey, et al
as 11-3509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD HORACE SAMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL D. DOWNEY, CHAD KOLITWENZEW, ADAM GRAVES and others
Riley v. Kolitwenzew
as 2:2011cv02196
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Riley
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, Mr. White, Nurse Charee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley et al v. Bukowki et al
as 1:2011cv04269
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Riley
Defendant:
Timothy F. Bukowki, Michael D. Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erskin v. Downey et al
as 2:2010cv02243
Petitioner:
Cortez S Erskin
Respondent:
Michael D Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew, Todd Scholendore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
