Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Lasley et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00232
Plaintiff:
Donivan Lasley , David Deuser , Gary Fogler and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Middleton v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv00296
Plaintiff:
Walter C Middleton
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Middleton v. Dart
as 1:2015cv09543
Plaintiff:
Walter C Middleton
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv03287
Plaintiff:
Sheila Middleton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Middleton v. The State of Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv04049
Plaintiff:
Bernard Middleton
Defendant:
The State of Illinois, ILL, Dept of Corrections, Western ILL. Corr. CTR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Middleton v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01253
Plaintiff:
Garry E. Middleton
Defendant:
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Perez et al
as 1:2014cv09744
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Juan Perez, Maria Middleton and Campeche Cuisine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. Hansen et al
as 3:2014cv00841
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
Sharon Hansen, Salvador Godinez, Jesse Mortgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Middleton v. Butler et al
as 1:2014cv03428
Petitioner:
Bernard Middleton
Respondent:
Kim Butler and Attorney General of the State of Illinois, Cook County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Middleton v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2014cv10128
Plaintiff:
Amanda Middleton
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
