Cases 31 - 40 of 41
PETOCK v. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2008cv00901
Plaintiff:
HARRY PETOCK
Defendant:
NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SUCKFIEL v. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2008cv00844
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SUCKFIEL
Defendant:
NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MURRELL v. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2008cv00838
Plaintiff:
DONNA MURRELL
Defendant:
NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BAILEY v. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2008cv00448
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN BAILEY
Defendant:
NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
AUSTIN v. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2008cv01038
Plaintiff:
NAOMI AUSTIN
Defendant:
NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CLARK v. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2008cv00102
Plaintiff:
DENIS G. CLARK
Defendant:
NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
GUALTIERI v. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2007cv01225
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GUALTIERI
Defendant:
NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
