Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Abdullah v. Berkebile et al
as 1:2013cv00732
Plaintiff:
Imam-Muhammad Abdullah
Defendant:
Berkebile, Kuda, Cassel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bruce et al v. Wilson, et al
as 1:2013cv00491
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
A. Osagie, C. Wilson, F. Cordova and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv00749
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Anthony Osagie, David Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah v. Hawitt et al
as 1:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
Imam-Muhammad Mustafa Abdullah
Defendant:
Hawitt, (I) Hawitt, Mendina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pinson et al v. Madison et al
as 1:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson and Erwin Villatoro
Defendant:
Richard Madison, Patricia Rangel, S. Kuta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah v. Samuels et al
as 1:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Imam-Muhammad Abdullah
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Berkebile, Munster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah v. Sammuels et al
as 1:2012cv02729
Plaintiff:
Imam Muhammad Abdullah
Defendant:
Sammuels, Berkbile, Gull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Abdullah v. Samuels et al
as 1:2012cv02501
Plaintiff:
Imam-Muhammad Mustafa Abdullah
Defendant:
Samuels, Williams, Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Murray v. Berkabile et al
as 1:2012cv02380
Plaintiff:
Greg Murray
Defendant:
David Berkabile, Paul Laird, Diane Krist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah v. Lappin et al
as 1:2012cv01826
Petitioner:
Khalifa Imam Muhammad Abdullah
Respondent:
Harley Lappin, Becky Bile, Chrss and others
Defendant:
Gonzelez and Finne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
